Introducing Guest Contributors: How Outside Analysis Works Here

This is a note from the desk, not a guest piece itself — it explains how this section works, since it will soon carry analysis from writers outside Bitcoin Logical’s core team.

What qualifies as a guest contribution

We are looking for writers who can produce a genuine First-Principles Take on a specific, falsifiable Bitcoin claim: cited evidence, evidence-based reasoning, and an honest statement of what the argument does not prove. We are not looking for opinion pieces without evidence, promotional content disguised as analysis, or coverage of assets outside Bitcoin and its immediate ecosystem.

What every guest piece will carry

• A clear “Guest Contributor” label, distinct from our desk byline, with the author named.
• A disclosure of any relevant Bitcoin holdings, employer relationships, or prior relationships with the subject of the piece.
• The same editorial bar as our own work: a stated claim, cited evidence, transparent reasoning, and an explicit “what this does not prove” section.
• A pre-publish check against our editorial guidelines, including our standing rule against AI-generated article prose.

What we will not do

We will not publish a guest piece under an invented name, will not accept undisclosed paid placements dressed as independent analysis, and will not water down the “what this does not prove” requirement for outside writers as a courtesy — it applies identically to guest work and to our own desk’s work.

Want to contribute?

See our careers and guest-contribution page for how to pitch. This section will be populated with real, named, consenting contributors as those relationships are established — we would rather it stay quiet for a while longer than fill it with anything less.